(i)The defendants (Agarwala brothers) were restrained from using SCRABULOUS, SCRABBLE or any other deceptively similar trademark.
(ii) The brothers were also restrained from metatagging, hyperlinking or including the infringing trademarks in the source code of their websites.
(iii) The court disagreed with the argument of the defendants that the mark SCRABBLE was "generic" in nature and therefore could not be protected.
(ii) The brothers were also restrained from metatagging, hyperlinking or including the infringing trademarks in the source code of their websites.
(iii) The court disagreed with the argument of the defendants that the mark SCRABBLE was "generic" in nature and therefore could not be protected.
No comments:
Post a Comment