A blog to impart info on the happenings in the world of IPR presented from a legal perspective.
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
L'OREAL vs. VLCC
There seems to be a dispute between the above mentioned companies with regards to the mark 'FUEL'. VLCC seems to have acquired the mark from a businessman, Mr. Mahesh Chaudhary int he year 2006.
L'oreal is reported to have acquired the same fromt he same individual. If true, both of these companie shave been duped. The next question is whether they can co-exist within the ambit of Section 12 of the Trademarks Act, 1999?
A hearing is scheduled at the Delhi High Court in the future....
L'oreal is reported to have acquired the same fromt he same individual. If true, both of these companie shave been duped. The next question is whether they can co-exist within the ambit of Section 12 of the Trademarks Act, 1999?
A hearing is scheduled at the Delhi High Court in the future....
Labels:
Delhi High Court,
Fuel,
L'oreal,
Mahesh Chaudhary,
trademark,
VLCC
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
INDIA JOINING THE MADRID PROTOCOL
The Lok Sabha, the lower House of the Indian Parliament has passed an amendment to the Trademarks Act wherein the country could sign the Madrid Protocol within the next year.
This is huge step forward as it would enable MNC's to file for trademark protection in India using the Madrid system. In the current economic scenario where we see Indian Companies forging ahead with Merger & Acquisition, this move could prove to be beneficial for Indian Companies as well.
This is huge step forward as it would enable MNC's to file for trademark protection in India using the Madrid system. In the current economic scenario where we see Indian Companies forging ahead with Merger & Acquisition, this move could prove to be beneficial for Indian Companies as well.
Monday, January 18, 2010
BHARTI WAL MART FACES HURDLES
The Bharti Wal-Mart joint venture in India is facing problems with the trademarking of some of its food products.
In 2008 the company filed applications to register its Great Value (GV) label with a logo to the Indian Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks.
It has been reported that the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks office did not grant either the logo or the trademark to Bharti Wal-Mart.
Wal-Mart has successfully registered the GV brand in other countries without incident, and the company has already launched several GV products in India without having the appropriate trademark registration for the products.
Bharti Wal-Mart has also filed several applications seeking to trademark ‘Indian-sounding' names, such as Sankskar, Sabhyata, Cimran, Pranay, Srishti and Jovaki, but the company faced opposition to most of these applications
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)